Artificial intelligence is no longer a distant promise discussed only in research labs or technology conferences. It is rapidly becoming the defining force reshaping the global economy, labour markets and the very structure of work. Few voices have been as candid about this transformation as the American businessman, lobbyist and political commentator, Andrew Yang who believes the world is standing on the edge of a technological shift far more disruptive than most people are prepared to confront.
When Yang recently returned from an artificial intelligence conference on the West Coast of the United States, the scale of what he had witnessed left him both impressed and unsettled. Even for someone who has spent years warning about automation, the pace of development was staggering.
“What we’re going to see in the next six months will outstrip what we’ve seen in the last ten years,” Yang said. “The rate of change is on a hockey stick curve heading sharply upward.”
YOU CAN ALSO READ: How Women in Energy Are Reshaping Africa’s Path to Sustainable Growth
For Yang, the most striking revelation was not just the sophistication of AI tools but the speed at which they are moving from experimentation to commercial deployment. One company he observed is selling autonomous coding systems to large enterprises. In just twelve months its revenue multiplied one hundredfold, a signal of how aggressively corporations are embracing AI driven productivity.
If that trajectory continues, Yang believes the implications for employment will be profound. The budgets that once funded large teams of software engineers could increasingly flow toward automated systems capable of producing the same output at a fraction of the cost.
Only a few years ago young people were repeatedly advised that learning to code was the most secure career path in the digital economy. That advice, Yang argues, is already beginning to age rapidly.
“Four years ago we told everyone the safest thing to do was learn to code,” he said. “Now the opposite may be becoming true.”
The warning echoes concerns raised by leaders inside the AI industry itself. Dario Amodei has repeatedly suggested that artificial intelligence could automate up to half of entry level white collar jobs within the next several years. Yang says those predictions should be taken seriously.
“The easiest people to replace are the ones you haven’t hired yet,” he explained. “That’s why companies are quietly reducing hiring for recent graduates.”
The data already reflects the shift. In the United States unemployment and underemployment among college graduates is climbing, and for the first time in modern history the jobless rate among degree holders is approaching that of non graduates. The traditional assumption that higher education guarantees economic security is beginning to fracture.
Yang believes this is only the beginning of a much deeper transformation.
Call centres, which still employ millions of workers across the United States, are among the most exposed sectors. AI voice agents can now replicate human conversation with startling realism while handling thousands of simultaneous interactions. Once those systems reach full maturity, the economics of call centre employment may change overnight.
An even more disruptive shift could come in transportation. Truck driving remains the single most common occupation in twenty eight American states. Autonomous driving technology is advancing steadily, and if it reaches commercial viability at scale, the social impact could be enormous.
“You’re talking about millions of workers,” Yang said. “Many of them are middle aged men, many of them veterans. If that occupation disappears, the consequences will be massive.”
Ride hailing drivers and delivery workers could face similar disruptions as autonomous vehicles and AI powered logistics networks expand.
Despite these risks Yang insists that the timeline may be far shorter than most policymakers expect. After speaking with developers and engineers at the recent AI conference he left with the sense that the industry is preparing for a wave of automation within the next year.
“The entire sector is bracing for impact,” he said.
Within Silicon Valley reactions to the coming disruption vary dramatically. Some engineers are immersing themselves in AI tools, working relentlessly to remain indispensable in a rapidly evolving landscape. Others Yang says are quietly reconsidering their place in the industry altogether.
“Some of them are literally moving to rural areas because they believe their skills are about to become obsolete,” he noted.
Financial markets are also reinforcing the shift. Investors increasingly reward companies that reduce headcount and replace labour with automation. Layoff announcements often trigger immediate gains in share prices, signalling to executives that efficiency, even when it comes at the expense of jobs, is welcomed by the market.
Yang believes this incentive structure will accelerate corporate adoption of AI across nearly every sector of the economy.
“The stock market reaction tells CEOs exactly what investors want,” he said. “And they’re responding.”
Yet even as corporations rush to deploy AI systems many executives are still learning how to control them. In some cases AI agents have begun autonomously rewriting software code or executing tasks without direct human instruction. Companies are now experimenting with governance structures to ensure that automated systems remain aligned with human oversight.
There will inevitably be implementation failures, Yang says, but those challenges are unlikely to slow the broader transformation.
“This is the future,” he said. “And companies that don’t adopt these tools will very quickly be seen as outdated.”
YOU CAN ALSO READ: AI Will Soon Become as Essential as Electricity, Says Open AI’s CEO, Sam Altman
For Yang the central policy question is how societies adapt to the new economic reality. He has long advocated for Universal Basic Income, arguing that governments must rethink the relationship between productivity, technology and income distribution.
As artificial intelligence amplifies corporate efficiency while displacing workers Yang believes tax systems may also need to evolve. Instead of heavily taxing human labour he suggests governments should consider taxing the AI systems and companies that benefit most from automation.
The idea is no longer as radical as it once sounded. Even some leaders within the AI sector have acknowledged that widespread automation could require new economic policies to maintain social stability.
For Yang the challenge is not merely technological but societal. Artificial intelligence may unlock extraordinary economic potential, but without thoughtful governance it could also deepen inequality and social unrest.
The world, he believes, is entering a moment that will test how prepared governments, businesses and citizens are for a future in which machines perform an ever greater share of human work.
And if the pace of progress continues on its current trajectory that future may arrive far sooner than most people expect.
